Skip to Content
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Log In
Legislation

A Big Tax Break for the Trucking Industry Hides in the House Transportation Bill

About 40 cars occupy five lanes of highway in crawling traffic that stretches off to the horizon..

Traffic congestion on I-93 in downtown Boston. I-93 is one of the state’s biggest sources of air pollution, and a major source of regional traffic congestion.

The new House of Representatives proposal to raise additional revenue for the Commonwealth’s roads, bridges, and transit systems appears to include a multi-million dollar tax break for Massachusetts trucking businesses.

The long-awaited House transportation finance bill, H. 4508, was filed on Feb. 26th after weeks of negotiations behind closed doors. The bill proposes to raise roughly half a billion dollars in additional revenue for transportation projects through a 5-cent gasoline tax increase, a 9-cent increase to diesel fuel taxes, hikes to the Commonwealth's minimum corporate tax rates, and higher fees on app-based ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft.

But in the middle of the bill lies language that would also grant a significant tax break to commercial trucks and trailers.

Section 11 of the proposed legislation would edit the list of exemptions in the state's sales tax law (Chapter 64H of the Massachusetts General Laws) to add "sales of rolling stock used by common carriers to transport goods in interstate commerce."

An annotated copy of H.4508, the House transportation financing bill. showing the section that would exempt truck sales from the state sales tax.
An annotated copy of H.4508, the House transportation financing bill. showing the section that would exempt truck sales from the state sales tax.
An annotated copy of H.4508, the House transportation financing bill. showing the section that would exempt truck sales from the state sales tax.

Similar language (in Section 14 of the new bill) would also exempt "storage, use or other consumption of rolling stock, used by common carriers to transport goods in interstate commerce" from the state's 6.25 percent use tax, which applies to equipment purchased out-of-state.

Under current law, the 6.25 percent sales tax on a $150,000 truck purchase would generate $9,375 in revenue for the Commonwealth's Transportation Trust Fund.

Phineas Baxandall, an analyst for the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center who tipped off StreetsblogMASS about the tax break over the weekend, says that it could cost the Commonwealth $9 to $11 million in lost revenue.

"If the goal of the bill is to add funding for transportation, it’s not clear why this revenue reduction was included," wrote Baxandall in an email message. "This is enough revenue to enable several regional transportation authorities to be fare-free, to make substantial road repairs, or other important functions that should not get shortchanged without strong reasons. It’s not clear what pressing public good is advanced by this.”

In a prepared statement shared with StreetsblogMASS, Kevin Weeks, the executive director of the Trucking Association of Massachusetts, argued that 37 other states already exempt truck sales from their sales taxes, and wrote that "the trucking industry in Massachusetts has been in decline as many trucking companies have gone out of business or moved to other states."

The statement from Weeks also made note of the 9-cent increase to the diesel fuel tax, which will land squarely on his industry, and argued that eliminating the tax on new trucks would give fleet owners an incentive to operate "newer, cleaner, and safer trucks in the Commonwealth."

On Tuesday afternoon and again on Wednesday morning, StreetsblogMASS reached out to Rep. Aaron Michlewitz (D-Boston), the Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, to inquire about how the tax break came to be included in the legislation. We are still awaiting his response.

Rep. Tami Gouveia (D-Acton) has filed an proposed amendment to the bill that would remove the trucking tax break language.

Lawmakers are expected to debate that and dozens of other possible amendments in this afternoon's formal session of the House of Representatives.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Massachusetts

Roadblocked: Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Eliminates Most Federal Funding For Allston Highway Realignment

Without a formal project agreement in place, MassDOT will receive only $8 million out of a $335 million "reconnecting communities" grant that the Biden administration had pledged.

July 10, 2025

Another Bus Lane Bites the Dust: Wu Administration Forces Chelsea, Charlestown Transit Riders to Wait In More Traffic

The change comes just weeks before the MBTA rolls out a new bus lane enforcement system, which is expected to improve bus service considerably – at least on the dwindling number of streets where dedicated bus lanes still exist.

July 8, 2025

Balanced For Now – But Beacon Hill Is Putting the T Back On the Edge of Another Fiscal Cliff

The state's final budget gives the T about $80 million less than it had planned to spend in the coming fiscal year to cover its payroll and other transit operating costs.

July 7, 2025

Ambulance Data Reveals That Boston Drivers Are 4 Times More Likely to Run Over Pedestrians From Black Neighborhoods

"Overall, residents of predominantly Black and Latino neighborhoods are about four times more likely than residents of predominantly white neighborhoods to be struck as a pedestrian."

July 1, 2025
See all posts