Skip to Content
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Log In
Environment

Logan Airport Invites Travelers to Honor Earth Day By Incinerating Gasoline

A screenshot of the Boston Logan International Airport’s Earth Day tweet, which was deleted on Monday afternoon after amassing hundreds of scornful replies.

On Monday, a Boston Logan International Airport social media staffer, possibly impaired from the permanent haze of toxic, partially-combusted hydrocarbons that hangs over their workplace, invited travelers to celebrate Earth Day by driving to the airport.

"For those traveling, parking at the airport brings you close to your terminal and reduces the impact on the environment. #EarthDay," tweeted the Boston Logan International Airport shortly after 10 a.m. on Patriots' Day.

The tweet, which neglected to mention any of the airport's abundant public transportation options, was quickly ratioed with a flood of incredulous reactions from all over the world.

"Did a parking garage write this?" asked one user from North Carolina.

The Massachusetts Sierra Club called it "ridiculous greenwashing."

"Bad buzz pour l’aéroport @BostonLogan," wrote a Francophone journalist.

Airport staff deleted the tweet Monday afternoon after it had racked up several hundred reactions – most of which were extremely scornful.

Streetsblog reached out to Massport, the state agency in charge of the airport, to offer them a chance to explain the tweet's reasoning.

Jennifer Mehigan, Massport's Director of Media Relations, didn't seem to understand what the big deal was.

"Are you serious that this is generating a lot of attention?" responded Mehigan in an email message on Monday afternoon. "We have had similar messaging for years."

"Passengers that park at Logan generate two car trips – they drive there, then home – while being dropped off and later picked up by a loved one generates four car trips," Mehigan explained. "Logan Express and other HOV modes are better for the environment, though parking is better than 'pick up/drop off' and often better than taxis and TNCs (e.g., Uber or Lyft) if those cars come to or leave Logan empty."

In essence: driving to the airport is "good" for the environment because it's only half as bad as driving there twice – kind of like, if I were to kill just one panda bear, that would be good for the planet because I showed restraint and didn't kill two of them.

The kicker: because it was built on landfill over former marshlands and open waters of Boston Harbor, Logan Airport is especially vulnerable to rising sea levels and the increasingly severe storm surges associated with a warming climate, and the airport is already spending millions of dollars on "resiliency" projects to protect its infrastructure from flooding.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Massachusetts

Boston City Council Seeks Oversight of Mayor’s Transportation Agenda

A hearing order from City Council President Liz Breadon warns that "continued delays to the advancement of these transportation projects could jeopardize an estimated $200 million in public investment."

March 16, 2026

Globe Report Implicates Mayor Michelle Wu In Street Safety, Transit Project Cancellations

The mayor's about-face on street safety initiatives has already cost the City of Boston millions of dollars in lost federal funding.

March 16, 2026

Trump’s Oil Crisis Is Already Costing Massachusetts Drivers Over $2.4 Million A Day In Higher Gas Prices

Massachusetts drivers are now cumulatively spending $20.9 million a day at the pump – more than twice the daily cost of operating the entire MBTA system.

March 13, 2026

Guest Column: South Station Is Not An Adequate Emergency Shelter

There are numerous other public buildings nearby that offer better adaptability, dignity, and safety for unhoused residents.

March 11, 2026
See all posts