Skip to content

Unpublicized City Hall Polling Reveals Broad Support for Bike Projects, Blue Hill Ave. Bus Rapid Transit

StreetsblogMASS has obtained internal City of Boston polling documents that show a strong majority of city residents support the proposed Blue Hill Avenue bus transitway project, and that a plurality of residents support bike lane projects, even when it comes at the expense of car lanes and on-street parking.
A long line of people on bikes rides along a bike lane through an intersection. In the background is a large park with a subway station entrance on the corner. A green sign on the subway station reads "BOYLSTON". In the front of the line is a man in a teal bike helmet carrying a young child in a purple helmet on a kids seat in front of him.
A stream of Bike to Work Day traffic crosses Tremont Street next to the Boylston Green Line station on the morning of Friday, May 16, 2025.

StreetsblogMASS has obtained internal City of Boston polling documents that show a strong majority of city residents support the proposed Blue Hill Avenue bus transitway project, and that a plurality of residents support bike lane projects, even when it comes at the expense of car lanes and on-street parking.

The city collected opinions from roughly 1,600 city residents who participated in a digital survey conducted in the first quarter of 2025, as Mayor Wu was beginning to gear up her re-election campaign and as her administration was launching its secretive “30-day review” of bike lane and bus lane projects.

The survey targeted respondents to get a represenative sample of Boston’s population in terms of age groups, gender, race and ethnicity, and neighborhoods of residence.

StreetsblogMASS first learned of the poll from an internal City Hall slide deck that summarized the results for city staff.

We confirmed its authenticity by reaching out to Daniel Steele, a former City of Boston research adviser whose name appears on the slide deck, and who helped administer the survey in partnership with zencity.io, a polling firm.

Steele no longer works for the city, but he discussed the results with us and provided some technical background information for this story.

More bike project supporters than opponents

City Hall’s polling indicated that bike lane projects were not particularly controversial, nor divisive.

“For polarizing issues, you’d expect to see a lot more people in the ‘strongly oppose’ and ‘strongly support’ columns,” said Steele. “This is not a polarizing issue for most people.”

A bar chart under the polling question ""Would you support building separated bike lanes even if some space for driving or parking needs to be removed?". The bars indicate 45% support, 34% opposed, and 17.9% who neither support nor oppose.
Polling results from the City of Boston’s quarterly public opinion survey, winter 2025. Note: an additional 4.1% of respondents to this question responded that they had no opinion.

The polling also debunks tropes that bike lanes are more controversial among certain racial and ethnic groups.

In reality, the polling found no significant differences in opinion by skin color, although white people are slightly more likely to be “strongly opposed” to bike lane projects:

A table under the polling question ""Would you support building separated bike lanes even if some space for driving or parking needs to be removed?". Columns describe racial groups (Asian, Latino, White, and Black/African American) and the rows indicate 5 levels of support, from "strongly support" to "neither support nor oppose" to "strongly oppose".

The numbers in each column are generally within 0-6 percentage points of each other. Between 22 and 26 percent of each group responded "strongly support". There was more racial variation in the "strongly oppose" row: 9% of Asian respondents, 13% of Hispanic/Latino respondents, 22% of white respondents, and 16% of Black respondents.
Source: City of Boston winter 2025 quarterly public opinion survey.

Similarly, there were no significant differences of opinion among varying household income groups and education levels.

There was, however, one demographic that is more likely to despise bike lanes, regardless of their race or class: residents aged 55 and older.

While a majority of respondents under 35 said that they support bike lanes, 42 percent of residents older than 55 say they “strongly oppose” them:

A table under the polling question ""Would you support building separated bike lanes even if some space for driving or parking needs to be removed?". Columns describe age groups (18-34, 35-54, and 55+) and the rows indicate 5 levels of support, from "strongly support" to "neither support nor oppose" to "strongly oppose". For 55+ respondents, a plurality responded "strongly oppose" (42%) vs. 12% who responded "strongly support". But younger age groups had a plurality of responses in the "strongly support" row: 27% for 18-34 year olds and 25% for 35-54 year olds, and the "somewhat support" column runs from 25%, 22%, 14% from youngest group to oldest.
Source: City of Boston winter 2025 quarterly public opinion survey.

Blue Hill Avenue bus rapid transit has broad citywide support, though polarizing in Mattapan

A second question from the winter 2025 polling asked residents about the Blue Hill Avenue busway project between Mattapan and Grove Hall.

The full survey question included a lengthly introduction to give respondents some background information.

“Boston’s Blue Hill Ave. is getting a major redesign to add center-running bus lanes and bike lanes,” pollsters explained. “While some traffic lanes may be removed, it will nearly double the current capacity for moving people to about 15,000 users per hour. The project will add 150 trees and about 20 basketball courts of greenery to the roadway, while maintaining 90 percent of existing parking. Do you support this project?”

Citywide, 60 percent of respondents answered that they either “somewhat” or “strongly” supported the project, compared to only 15 percent of respondents who expressed some degree of opposition.

Source: City of Boston winter 2025 quarterly public opinion survey.

A quarter of respondents either expressed no opinion or said that they didn’t know enough about the project to form one.

As with the bike lanes question, there were no significant differences of opinions between racial groups or income levels.

There was slightly more opposition among the group of respondents aged 55 or older, but even in that age group, far more respondents said that they would support the Blue Hill Avenue busway project compared to the number who expressed opposition.

One noteworthy distinction from these citywide results was the breakdown of support by neighborhood.

Source: City of Boston winter 2025 quarterly public opinion survey.

While the project has considerably more supporters than opponents in every neighborhood across the city, respondents from neighborhoods near Blue Hill Avenue had considerably higher levels of “strong opposition” to the project.

Steele noted that the project is, in fact, polarizing in the neighborhoods where it would be built. But even there, supporters outnumber opponents 48 percent to 31 percent.

Punditry vs. the public

The city’s poll results seem to differ considerably from another public opinion poll that the Boston Globe and Suffolk University conducted last summer.

In that survey, pollsters asked 500 likely preliminary election voters “what impact have bike lanes had on your ability to get around the city?”

50 percent of respondents answered that bike lanes had made it “slower and less convenient to get around,” versus 18 percent who answered that bike lanes made it “easier and safer” to travel.

Rich Parr, a pollster for the MassINC polling group, noted that the the two questions are fundamentally different, and their results are not necessarily inconsistent.

“You might think that bike lanes are kind of a pain in the butt and make it harder to get around, but you could still believe they’re worth building for the sake of safety,” Parr observed.

Another key difference in the two polls involved who actually took the surveys.

The city’s poll surveyed 1,500 people from across the city, representing a broad swath of the city’s demographics.

The Globe/Suffolk poll surveyed 500 likely voters for the city’s preliminary elections – a contest that historically gets low voter turnout.

“The pool of city residents (in the city’s poll) is going to be younger, and more diverse, whereas registered voters are going to be whiter, more settled as homeowners, less likely to be students,” said Parr. “And then finally the ‘likely’ votes for a mayoral election are the most rarified group, older, much more settled in their communities, more likely to be homeowners.”

There’s a third important difference between the two polls.

The Globe/Suffolk poll was sponsored by the region’s biggest newspaper, and covered widely in the local media. The city’s polling results never left City Hall – until now.

In a July article about the poll’s results, Globe political reporter Emma Platoff labelled bike lanes a “vulnerable point” in Wu’s campaign.

Television pundit Jon Keller cited the Suffolk poll to allege that “voters were still fuming” over the Wu administration’s street safety projects, and theorized that challenger Josh Kraft would have been more successful if only he had spent even more time griping about bike lanes.

As it turns out, Mayor Wu’s administration had information that debunked those assertions.

Steele’s slide deck included a screenshot of an anonymous reader comment in the Boston Globe which alleged “the 1 percent of bike lane proponents are going to be furious at the 99 percent of people who hate bike lanes.”

“If we only read the Globe, we would have a very skewed picture,” wrote Steele.


Learn more: view the City of Boston’s community survey slide deck here.

Photo of Christian MilNeil
Christian has edited StreetsblogMASS since its founding in spring 2019. Before that, he was a data reporter for the Portland Press Herald in Maine. Got tips? Send them to me via Signal, the encrypted messaging app, at 207-310-0728.

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog Massachusetts

You’re Authorized to Read Friday’s Headlines

April 10, 2026

The Bay State’s Special Education Transportation System Is Draining School Budgets

April 8, 2026

Some Commuter Rail Riders Will Face Longer Waits, Slower Rides During World Cup

April 6, 2026

Another Federal Funding Fumble: Boston Loses $8.15 Million for Safety Project At Deadly Fenway Intersection

April 2, 2026

Fair Share Funds Will Keep ValleyBike Growing In Western Mass.

March 31, 2026
See all posts