Memo For the #ClimateStrike: Cars and Trucks Generate Most of New England’s Pollution

Massachusetts greenhouse gas emissions by source since 1990. Courtesy of the Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Massachusetts greenhouse gas emissions by source since 1990. Courtesy of the Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection.

Tomorrow morning, thousands of students from all over Massachusetts will leave their classes to converge in Boston’s City Hall Plaza and demand a meaningful response to the climate emergency as part of the Global Climate Strike movement.

In Massachusetts, meaningful action against climate change will require leaders in the State House and in municipal governments all over the state to rein in the use of cars and trucks, which are the biggest source of the state’s climate-heating pollutants (see chart above).

Massachusetts has been effective in promoting energy efficiency in other sectors. The state’s power plants, homes and businesses have all made significant progress in cutting energy use and shifting to renewable sources of power.

But the state has so far failed to make similar progress in its transportation systems.

In fact, pollution levels have been trending upwards in recent years, in spite of improving fuel efficiency in new cars and generous incentives for electric vehicles, because Massachusetts residents are driving more and causing more traffic jams. And electric cars, which are forecast to remain a small portion of vehicles on the road for many years to come, won’t be anywhere near sufficient to the task of cutting emissions by half in the next decade, when action is most urgent.

Political leaders and transportation bureaucrats have plenty of great reasons to design safer streets that accommodate fewer cars. It would make our cities safer from violent drivers who kill and maim innocent people daily, and from the deadly pollution-related chronic diseases that disproportionately impact people of color. It would make our cities more equitable, and save us from wasting thousands of hours stuck in stressful traffic jams instead of in our jobs or with our families.

So, after we march on Beacon Hill tomorrow, let’s double down on holding local and state officials accountable – at every opportunity – by demanding serious changes to the state’s transportation policies. To survive the climate emergency, Massachusetts needs to put an end to the failed, climate-baking highway engineering of the 20th century, and instead start building for a future with fewer cars.


Event details: Boston Climate Strike

Friday, Sept. 20, 2019
Rally at City Hall Plaza begins at 11:30 a.m.; march to the State House at 1 p.m.
RSVP here.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Worcester City Hall and the newly rebuilt Main Street, pictured in December 2020.

It’s Worcester Week on StreetsblogMASS

|
We’re focusing our coverage this week on Worcester, New England’s second-biggest city. After decades of destructive urban renewal schemes, Worcester can be a challenging place to get around for people who don’t own a car. Compared to the rest of Massachusetts, Worcester has higher-than-average rates of injury-causing crashes, and lower rates of transit ridership. Which […]
Batteries can't fix this: a midday traffic jam on I-93 in downtown Boston.

Guest Column: Electric Cars Won’t Save Us

|
To meet its climate goals, Massachusetts will need to eliminate gasoline-powered vehicles from the state’s roadways within the next 25 years. But the Commonwealth’s new decarbonization roadmap aims to accomplish this not with improvements to transit and safer streets, but with widespread subsidies for new electric vehicles. Massachusetts is home to many of the world’s […]