Skip to content

Andover Town Meeting Rejects Cops’ E-Bike Registry Proposal

Voters in Andover's Town Meeting have rejected their town police department's proposal to mandate a new e-bike registration system that would have only applied to lower-speed pedal-assist bicycles.

Voters in Andover’s Town Meeting have rejected their town police department’s proposal to mandate a new e-bike registration system that would have only applied to lower-speed pedal-assist bicycles.

Warrant Article 39, submitted at the request of Andover Police Chief Patrick Keefe, proposed that “all electric bicycles operated or stored within the Town of Andover must be registered with the Andover Police Department” with fines of up to $300 per violation.

Andover Town Meeting voting results on a proposal to mandate a new registry for low-speed e-bikes. Courtesy of WalkBike Andover.

However, the proposed bylaw would have only applied to “class 1” and “class 2” pedal-assist e-bikes – defined in state law as bikes with a smaller electric motor of 750 watts or less that ceases to operate at speeds over 20 mph.

Higher-speed electric dirt bikes and motorcycles would have remained unregulated under the police department’s proposal.

“By and large, we all kind of agree on what the problem is: there are predominantly young folks riding around town on high-powered bikes in a way that is unsafe and technically against the rules,” says Andrew Lewine, an advocate with WalkBike Andover.

“But we strongly feel that low-speed e-bikes are kind of the solution; it’s great that kids are out on their own, we love the independence it provides, to be able to go out and see friends and get around the town. The fact that they’re riding 30 or 40 mph is not so great. So we need to figure out ways to get those kids onto legal e-bikes,” Lewine continued.

The proposed warrant article was the very last item on this year’s Town Meeting, held on April 29 and 30 (Andover has an open town meeting, which means that any registered voter can show up and vote electronically).

Town meeting voters rejected the proposal 69 percent to 27 percent.

Photo of Christian MilNeil
Christian has edited StreetsblogMASS since its founding in spring 2019. Before that, he was a data reporter for the Portland Press Herald in Maine. Got tips? Send them to me via Signal, the encrypted messaging app, at 207-310-0728.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog Massachusetts

Wednesday’s Headlines Are Bought and Paid For

May 13, 2026

State Street Improvements Delayed: One of Downtown’s Most Poorly-Designed Streets Will Get A Fresh Coat of Asphalt Instead

May 12, 2026

Red Line’s Ashmont, Mattapan Branch Closure Begins 6 P.M. Thursday

May 12, 2026

Not For Granite: New Hampshire Man Isn’t Laughing At Menacing ‘Joke’ From State Lawmaker

May 12, 2026

PHOTOS: A Hard-Hat Tour of the MBTA’s New Electric Bus Garages

May 11, 2026
See all posts