Skip to Content
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Streetsblog Massachusetts home
Log In
Legislation

Gov. Healey’s Environmental Bond Bill Would Surrender Dept. of Conservation ‘Parkways’ to State Highway Agency

A DCR spokesperson said that the parkways, several of which were originally designed by the Olmsted brothers to be scenic links in a regional parks system, "no longer served a park purpose."

A line of large cars waits at a highway off-ramp at right as three kids on bikes approach the camera on a long crosswalk next to a multi-lane highway. Above the offramp at right is a large electronic billboard rising up into the blue sky.

Kids ride their bikes across the wide off-ramp from Interstate 93 along the Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Mystic Valley Parkway in Medford on July 22, 2025.

Governor Healey is proposing legislation that would transfer several large, albeit heavily-paved parks from the state's conservation agency to MassDOT.

The language is embedded in the Governor's proposed Mass Ready Act, also known as the environmental bond bill.

Most of the bill's text would give the Governor permission to borrow up to $3 billion for infrastructure projects, many of which are aimed at mitigating the risks of rising seas and a heating climate.

But the bill would also transfer several parkways from the custody of the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) to the Commonwealth's biggest polluter, MassDOT.

Section 65 of the bill stipulates that "the Department of Conservation and Recreation shall transfer the care, custody and control of the following parkways to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation":

  • Charles River Dam Road in the cities of Boston and Cambridge;
  • Revere Beach Parkway (Route 16), including Wellington Circle, from Interstate 93/Route 38 in the city of Medford to the intersection with Route 145 (Winthrop Avenue)/Route 1A in the city of Revere;
  • The Fellsway from Wellington Circle to its intersection with Interstate 93 in the cities of Medford and Somerville;
  • Mystic Avenue in the city of Somerville;
  • The Lynnway in the city of Lynn.
  • Medford Veterans' Memorial Highway in the cities of Medford and Somerville (editor's note: this appears to be a segment of Route 16 that is also described in the second bullet: Chapter 304 of the Acts of 1950 designated "the highway running over the Mystic marshes from the intersection of Harvard Street and Mystic Avenue to Wellington Circle" in Medford as the Medford Veterans' Memorial Highway).
A map of the cities north of Boston, with Boston Harbor on the right, highlighting in pink 7 roadways: Everett St. and Charles River Dam Rd.  near the Charles River in Boston (lower edge), Mystic Ave., Fellsway, and Revere Beach Parkway, which form a triangle in the center of the map around the Mystic River, the Lynnway in Lynn at upper right, and Ravine Road in Stoneham and Melrose, at the upper center edge of the map.
A map of DCR parkways that Gov. Healey is proposing to transfer to MassDOT and local municipalities in her 2025 "Mass Ready Act" legislation.

Additionally, the bill would also authorize the transfer of two smaller streets from the DCR to municipal control:

  • Ravine Road in Stoneham, between Fellsway East to the town line, to the town of Stoneham;
  • Ravine Road in Melrose, between West Wyoming Avenue to the town line, to the town of Melrose;
  • Everett Street in the Allston-Brighton neighborhood to the city of Boston.

Language in the bill further stipulates that "the exact boundaries" of each of these parkways "shall be determined by the commissioner of capital asset management and maintenance."

Mission abandoned

Both the Fellsway and the Revere Beach Parkway were originally designed by the famous Olmsted Brothers landscape architecture firm, and both are listed in the National Register of Historic Places.

A detail from the Olmsted Brothers' 1899 plan for the new Revere Beach Parkway in Medford and Everett, commissioned by the Metropolitan Park Commission, envisioned the roadway as a scenic carriage road lined with trees and parklands. Courtesy of the National Park Service's Frederick Law Olmsted National Historic Site.

In the Olmsteds' original plans, these roadways were modest, two-lane carriage roads lined with allées of trees, designed to be regional extensions of Boston's Emerald Necklace for the region's new Metropolitan Park System.

A spokesperson for the DCR, whose mission is to "protect, promote and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural and recreational resources," told StreetsblogMASS last week that these parkways "no longer served a park purpose."

"While the roads are often near a DCR property, their main objective is to serve the local public or high-volume traffic, not to provide access to a park or natural resource," the spokesperson said.

They added that MassDOT and DCR already have an existing administrative agreement for MassDOT's Highway Division to maintain most of these roads.

A path to improvement

For several advocates for safer streets, though, the proposed transfer could have a big potential upside.

"The DCR doesn't do a good job following any vision zero or complete streets practices, mainly because they're not beholden to," said Galen Mook, executive director of MassBike.

MassDOT, on the other hand, requires safe walking and biking facilities in major roadway projects, and as an agency, it also has more organizational capacity to manage those projects.

Karl Alexander, the Greenways Program Senior Manager for the Mystic River Watershed Association, notes that MassDOT has had a much more active role in recent years advancing safety upgrades along the Mystic River, including its proposed Main Street safety improvements near Medford Square and ongoing safety upgrades where the Fellsway intersects with Mystic Ave. in East Somerville.

"We believe a formal transfer of roadway ownership would allow DCR to focus more on its conservation and recreation mission for adjacent open spaces in the Mystic River Reservation, reducing duplicated efforts with MassDOT," Alexander wrote to StreetsblogMASS in an email last week.

Other conservation advocates counter that DCR has never received enough state funding or political support to redesign its parkways as safer streets.

At a July 24 meeting of the DCR's Stewardship Council, Laura Jasinski, Executive Director of the Charles River Conservancy, asked her colleagues whether the proposal is “penalizing the agency for not having the resources to adequately care for the parkways.”

Mook suggests that the language of the legislation could be amended to make more explicit the parkways' role in reducing regional traffic pollution and enhancing access to adjacent conservation lands.

"My main concern is that the DOT can claim to focus solely on throughput and not recreation, and the DOT hasn't shown they have a plan to tangibly reduce vehicle miles traveled," as required by the state's climate laws, says Mook.

"I would like to see the 'park' nature of these roads guaranteed in the language of the transfer," Mook suggested.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter